Judgement
What to change, and what must not be touched.
Repairing a photograph so it survives printing is one act. Making the person look better is a different act, and it is the one that goes wrong.
The short answer
Fix damage. Do not improve the person. Creases, tears, dust, scratches, fading, colour casts, glare and a date stamp in the corner are all fair game. Skin smoothing, whitening teeth, thinning a face, removing a mole, a scar, glasses or a squint are not — because the people at the service will look for those things and find them missing.
The test is simple: if the change makes the photograph a worse record and a better picture, do not make it.
01 · The lineDamage is what happened to the photograph. The face is who the person was.
Restoration work divides into two things that look similar in a portfolio and are not remotely the same.
Repair removes things that are there and should not be: a crease across the corner, dust, foxing spots, a tear in the margin, the yellow cast of a print that sat in sunlight, the shadow of the phone that photographed it. Every part of the original subject survives. The work is subtraction.
Alteration changes the subject: a smoothed cheek, a narrower jaw, whiter teeth, a removed mole, a changed hairline, a softened squint. The work is invention, and it is aimed at the one part of the image everybody in the room is an expert on.
The failure mode is quiet. A lightly smoothed face looks fine at 900 pixels on a phone. Printed at 16 × 20 inches and lit in a chapel, it reads as a mannequin. The people who notice most are the ones who loved the person most.
02 · Fair gameThings that are almost always right to fix.
- Creases and folds, including the ones running through a face — these are physical damage to the paper, not to the person.
- Dust, speckling and foxing — the brown spots that appear on old prints.
- A colour cast. The pink or cyan drift of a 1970s print is fading, not skin tone. Correcting it restores the person's actual colour.
- Glare and reflections from photographing a framed print.
- A date stamp in the corner, and the crop marks of a lab print.
- Something distracting behind them — a bin, a doorway, a cluttered shelf. Removing it is not altering the person.
- Softness and moderate blur, within reason. Sharpening is subtraction. Inventing detail where the focus failed is not.
- A scratch through clothing or a background.
03 · Leave aloneThings that should stay exactly as they are.
- Moles, scars, birthmarks and anything else that was part of the face.
- Glasses, including the glare on them. Removing glasses changes who the person was.
- A squint, a lazy eye, a crooked tooth, a gap. These are the details people remember, often fondly.
- Lines, and the shape of the jaw, and the hairline. Age is not damage.
- The expression. A slightly tired or wry look is the person. A brightened, opened-up version of the same face is not.
- Whatever they are holding — a cigarette, a glass, a hand on a dog. Families sometimes ask for these to be removed. It is almost always a mistake, and always worth asking twice.
- Other people in the frame, unless there is no alternative.
04 · If you dislike somethingWhat to do when there is something you genuinely hate about the photograph.
Sometimes the honest answer is not to edit at all, but to change the use.
- Print it smaller. An 8 × 10 on the guest book table is far more forgiving than a 16 × 20 on an easel. If a detail bothers you, reduce the size rather than the person.
- Use a different photograph for the largest piece, and this one somewhere smaller.
- Ask for one area to be worked on, not the whole face. A good retoucher can rebuild a torn collar without touching a cheek. Say exactly what bothers you, and ask them to leave the rest alone.
- Ask for the untouched scan back. Always. It is your insurance: if you dislike the restoration, the original still exists and can be printed as it was.
If you are using an automated service, this is the one place where the tool matters more than the instructions. Systems that "enhance" faces tend to do it by default. Pinin is built to keep facial features where they are — what that means in practice — and the first restoration is free, so the cheapest way to judge any service is to run your worst photograph through it and look closely at the eyes.
05 · The proofHow to check a restoration before you print it.
Print a small test first. A 6 × 4 inch print costs almost nothing and shows more than a screen ever will, because the screen is backlit and generous and paper is neither.
Look at four things:
- The eyes. Hardness or perfect symmetry in the eyes is the clearest sign of a face that has been generated rather than recorded.
- The skin texture. Real skin at print size has variation. Smooth skin reads as plastic.
- The edges of the face against hair and background — where reconstruction gives itself away with a soft halo.
- The thing that is missing. Compare against the original and check whether a mole, a scar or a pair of glasses survived. This is the check almost nobody performs, and the one that matters most.
If the test print looks right at 6 × 4, it will look right at 16 × 20. If a face looks slightly wrong at 6 × 4, it will look badly wrong on the easel.
Questions people ask at this point.
Is it wrong to retouch a photograph of someone who has died?
Repairing damage is not retouching the person, and it is normally right: a crease through a cheek is damage to paper, not to a face. Changing features is the act that causes regret, because the people at the service recognise faces automatically and notice substitutions.
Should I remove a cigarette or a glass from the photograph?
Ask twice before doing it. Families often request it and often regret it, because those details are frequently what the person was like. If it must go, have one area worked on by a person rather than run the whole photograph through a filter.
Why do AI-restored faces look wrong when printed?
Because face enhancement invents detail rather than recovering it, and the invention is trained towards an averaged, idealised face. On a phone screen that reads as an improvement. At 16x20 in a chapel it reads as a stranger wearing the person's clothes.
Do I need to keep the original file?
Always ask for the untouched scan as well as the restored file. It costs nothing, it lets you reprint as the original if you dislike the result, and it is the only version that is a record rather than an interpretation.
The face should come through unchanged
Pinin is built for repair rather than beautification: fading, creases, dust, colour casts and blur, with facial features left where they are. First photograph free.
See what it does to your photograph